LIIofIndia Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries

Parliamentary Research Service
You are here:  LIIofIndia >> Databases >> Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries >> 2005 >> [2005] INPRSLS 9

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Documents | Noteup | LawCite | Help

The Carriage by Road Bill, 2005 - Legislative Brief [2005] INPRSLS 9 (7 December 2005)

Legislative Brief

The Carriage by Road Bill, 2005


The Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on December 7, 2005


The Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture (Chairman: Nilotpal Basu) submitted its report on March 21, 2006.

Highlights of the Bill

Key Issues and Analysis

Recent Briefs:

The Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 2006

August 11, 2006


The Seeds Bill, 2004

May 31, 2006


M R Madhavan

madhavan@prsindia.org


Seema Grover

seema@prsindia.org


August 18, 2006


PRS Legislative ResearchCentre for Policy Research Dharma Marg Chanakyapuri New Delhi – 110021

Tel: (011) 2611 5273-76, Fax: 2687 2746



PART A: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL

Context

At present, the rights and liabilities of persons engaged in the business of booking and transporting goods (common carriers) are governed by the Carriers Act, 1865. This Act covers transportation of goods by land or inland water by all service providers other than the government. Given the increased sophistication and complexity of the transport trade, a new law is proposed to be enacted to cater to present day requirements. The Carriage by Road Bill, 2005 will regulate the business of transporting goods by road using motorised vehicles.

Key Features

Registration and Certification

Responsibility of the consignor

Liabilities and responsibilities of the common carrier

Other provisions


PART B: KEY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

The Bill replaced the Carriers Act, 1865. We highlight the main points of departure in Table 1.

Table 1. Comparison of The Carriage by Road Bill, 2005 and The Carriers Act, 1865


The Carriage by Road Bill, 2005

The Carriers Act, 1865

Definitions

The definition of “common carrier” and “person” modified to make them more specific for motorised road transport.

Defines terms such as “Consignee”, “Consignor”, “Consignment”, “Goods” and “Goods Forwarding Note”.

Common carrier” includes all transport by land and inland navigation.


Does not define these terms.

Coverage

Only motorised transport by road, other than those provided by the government.

All transport by land and inland navigation, other than those provided by the government.

Registration

Certificate of registration is necessary for a person to engage in the business of common carrier. Registration authority shall take decisions on the applications for registration.

No provision for registration.

Liability of the Carrier

Carriers not to be liable for any loss of goods above Rs. 10,000, unless a higher rate for carrying risky goods is paid. In case of delay up to the period mutually agreed by the parties the liability is limited to the freight charges. And in case of delay exceeding such period, the liability is limited to the lower of Rs. 10,000 or the value of goods.

Carriers not to be liable for loss of certain goods (specified in a schedule) above Rs. 100 in value. No limitation on liability for loss or damage of other goods unless limited by a special contract.

No specific provision for delay.

Rate of charge for carrying risky goods

The carrier may fix a higher rate for carriage of consignment carrying risk. Recovery of freight charges not specified.

The carrier may fix a higher rate for carriage of items listed in the schedule, and with value exceeding Rs. 100. In case of damage or loss of goods, the amount paid to the carrier for the higher risk to be returned.

Carriage of hazardous goods

Carrier needs to ensure before transporting that the goods are insured.

No provisions for hazardous and dangerous goods.

Unclaimed consignment

Can sell unclaimed goods, retain a part of the proceeds for expenses and return the rest to the consignor or consignee.

No provision for sale of unclaimed consignment.

Source: The Carriage by Road Bill, 2005; The Carriers Act, 1865; PRS

Registration and Certification

Registration or Licensing?

The registering authority has discretionary powers to assess whether the common carrier “has intimate knowledge of goods or freight business”. The registering authority also has to satisfy itself that any individual applicant “has not been convicted of any offense involving moral turpitude”. These provisions are more in the nature of a “license” that gives the authority the discretion to decide who can operate in this business area. This appears much more than a “registration” that is an automatic process subject to meeting certain specified transparent criteria. The Standing Committee has suggested that the criteria for grant or rejection of application for Certificate of Registration should be clearly defined.1

Multiple Regulators

All goods vehicles need to be registered under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Truckers running their own vehicles as goods carriers will require an additional registration under the proposed Bill.

Under the draft Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 20062 all courier companies are required to get registered, and will be regulated by the authorities proposed by that Bill. Since all courier companies also come under the purview of the Carriage by Road Bill, they need two different registrations, and would be regulated by two different regulators.

Multiple Registrations

The Bill requires common carriers to register at their principal place of work and at all branch offices if these come under the jurisdiction of different registering authorities. This provision of multiple registrations could make the procedure lengthy.

Permission before Shifting Office

Every common carrier needs prior approval in writing before shifting the main office. This requirement is not in order to inform the change of address but to obtain prior permission.

Enquiry and Cancellation of Registration

In case of any complaint being made against a common carrier, the registering authority may give a notice to rectify the same. There is no mandatory requirement of an enquiry to ascertain the validity of the complaint before issuing such notice.

The registration of a common carrier may be revoked if there are five complaints or more in succession which are proved to be true. It appears that if five complaints are found to be true but are not in succession (for example, if complaints number 1 through 4 and number 6 are valid, and complaint number 5 is found invalid), then the registration will not be cancelled. Also, there is no timeframe for the complaints. That is, the registration is liable to be cancelled even if the five complaints occur over a ten-year period.

Coverage

Services provided by the government are excluded from the purview of this Bill.

Limits on Liabilities

Damage or loss of goods

In case of any loss or damage to the consignment, the liability of the common carrier is limited to Rs. 10,000 or the value of consignment, whichever is less. It is not clear how the amount (Rs 10,000) has been determined. A higher potential liability could be mutually agreed upon by the sender and the transporter in case of goods with higher risk, on payment of a risk rate.

The core issue is whether the transporter should be held responsible for the damage or loss of goods. Or whether it should be the consignor’s responsibility to take insurance cover for the goods. In this respect, the proposed Bill departs from the provisions of the Carriers Act, 1865. Under that Act, the liability is not limited (except for a specified list of items) unless a special contract was signed between the sender and the transporter limiting the liability. The proposed Bill flips this condition: the liability is limited for all goods unless the sender pays a higher risk rate to the transporter. Indeed, the liability of the transporter for loss of goods has been upheld by courts.3

The liability of the transporter in case of delay within a mutually agreed time period is limited at the freight rate. In case of delay beyond this period, the liability is limited to Rs 10,000. This raises the possibility of the transporter deliberately delaying a shipment in case the freight rate is higher than Rs 10,000. For example, if the freight rate is Rs 15,000, and there is a slight delay, the transporter will have to pay Rs 15,000; by delaying the shipment by a further period, he can reduce his liability to Rs 10,000.

Delay in collecting goods

Under the current system, the liability of the receiver of goods on late collection is determined by mutual agreement between the common carrier, the consignor and the consignee. This Bill sets norms for unclaimed consignments as well as for the liability of the common carrier (as discussed above). However, there is no provision for the liability of the consignee in case of late collection of goods, in order to compensate the carrier for storage costs (demurrage).






DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.





1Notes

. Report of the Departmentally Related Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture (Chairperson: Shri Nilotpal Basu) presented on March 21, 2006. See paragraph 16.4.3.

2. The draft Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 2006 is posted on the website of the Department of Posts (http://www.indiapost.gov.in/). An analysis of this proposed Bill and related documents are available at http://www.prsindia.org/indian_post%20_office(Amendment)Bill.htm.

3. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Original Petition No. 66 of 1992; Ms Tata Chemicals Ltd. vs. Skypak Couriers Pvt. Ltd.) upheld the decision of the Arbitrator that Skypak was liable to pay compensation of Rs 34,20,000 (including 18% interest) and a cost of Rs 50,000, and added costs of Rs 10,000 for loss/non delivery of a consignment worth Rs 34,00,000.


LIIofIndia: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.liiofindia.org/in/other/INPRSLS/2005/9.html