LIIofIndia Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries

Parliamentary Research Service
You are here:  LIIofIndia >> Databases >> Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries >> 2006 >> [2006] INPRSLS 17

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Documents | Noteup | LawCite | Help

The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Bill, 2006 - Legislative Brief [2006] INPRSLS 17 (18 December 2006)

Legislative Brief

The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Bill, 2006

The Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on December 18, 2006.

The Bill has been referred to the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs (Chairperson: Smt. Sushma Swaraj).

Highlights of the Bill

Key Issues and Analysis



Recent Briefs:

The Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth) Amendment Bill, 2006

December 1, 2006

The Forward Contract (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2006

November 14, 2006

Priya Narayan Parker

priya@prsindia.org

March 22, 2007

PRS Legislative ResearchCentre for Policy Research Dharma Marg Chanakyapuri New Delhi – 110021

Tel: (011) 2611 5273-76, Fax: 2687 2746

Full Disclosure:

The author works with an organisation that receives foreign contribution under FCRA, 1976.



PART A: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL1

Context

The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Bill, 2006 replaces the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act 1976. The original Act was established to regulate the acceptance and utilization of all foreign funds through donations or gifts. According to the Ministry of Home Affairs FCRA 2004-05 Annual Report, “The primary purpose of this Act is to ensure that foreign contribution is utilized for genuine activities without compromising on concerns for National Security.” The new Bill tightens restrictions on foreign contribution primarily to the voluntary sector and political organisations. It provides for closer government monitoring, additional registration requirements, and expands the classification of individuals prohibited from accepting any foreign contribution.

Non Government Organisations (NGOs) and the voluntary sector in India have expanded over the last ten years, of which many are funded at least partially by foreign donors. The number of FCRA-registered associations increased from 16,740 in 1995 to 30,321 in 2005 (of which about 60-65% reported their foreign contribution acceptance).

Foreign contribution increased from Rs 2,169 crore in 1995-96 to Rs 6,256 crore in 2004-05 (with a 23 per cent jump between 2003-04 and 2004-05).2 These funds constitute about 0.6% of the gross annual inflow of foreign funds into India.3 In comparison, the Indian corporate sector contributed about Rs 30,000 crore to Rs 35,000 crore to charitable institutions in 2006-07.4 In addition, individuals also donate to these institutions; we do not have reliable estimates of the total amount.

The major uses of foreign funds are establishment expenses (15%), relief and rehabilitation of victims of natural disasters (10%) and rural development (9%). The top foreign donors in 2004-05 were the Foundation Vincent E Ferrer, Spain (Rs 183 crore), World Vision International, USA (Rs 123 crore), Gospel for Asia, USA (Rs 110 crore) , Plan International, USA (Rs 65 crore), and Compassion International, USA (Rs 60 crore).Error: Reference source not found

Key Features

Regulation of Foreign Contribution and Foreign Hospitality

Compulsory Registration of Associations to Receive Foreign Contributions

Regulation of Funds for Registered Organisations

Accounts

Separate Auditing Structure, Inspection, Search and Seizure

Offences and Penalties


PART B: KEY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

Purpose of Bill

It is unclear whether the provisions in the Bill will fulfill the government’s objective to ensure that “individuals working in important areas of national life…function in a manner consistent with the values of a sovereign democratic republic”. It is also unclear whether the Bill is the appropriate means through which this goal may be accomplished.

Internal Security

The Bill is intended to help regulate foreign funds that could potentially be used for violent, fraudulent, or anti-national activities. The Bill does not cover national security issues regarding (a) all funds, whether sourced from India or abroad, and (b) all entities, including for-profit companies. Foreign funds currently received through FCRA are less than one per cent of all foreign funds entering the country. These are also less than one fifth of domestic donations to charitable institutions. Under the current law and the proposed Bill, there are loopholes for bypassing the FCRA requirements by channeling the funds through commercial firms as consultant fees, exports, etc.

Duplicate Laws

The 2006 Bill aims to tighten various requirements of the 1976 Act. However many of the objectives of the Bill are met by other laws in force such as the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act 1967,5 the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 20026 and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 19997. Also, auditing and reporting issues are covered by the Income Tax Act, 1961, as well as the laws governing companies, trusts, societies etc. The conduct of judges, bureaucrats etc. are part of their service rules, while that of candidates for election are covered by election-related rules. If there are any loopholes that need to be plugged, amendments to the respective Acts and Rules might be an efficient method to do so. These measures could cover the issues being addressed by FCRA, and make it redundant.

FCRA Registration Requirements

In order to be eligible to receive foreign contribution, the Bill requires voluntary organisations to register with FCRA to accept such funding. The registration process under the Bill confers a number of discretionary powers to the authorised officer.

Renewal of FCRA Certificate

Whereas the 1976 Act required a one-time registration for organisations to receive FCRA funding, the new Bill requires organisations to renew their FCRA certificate every five years. The renewal will also carry a fee. The organisation must apply for renewal within 6 months of the expiration of the certificate. Such requirements could increase cost and effort for organisations.

Approval/Rejection of Certificate

The Bill does not provide a time limit within which the FCRA authorities must either grant or deny a certificate of registration or renewal. The authority has to provide reasons for the rejection only to the extent required by the Right to Information Act, 2005. There is no process for review or appeal in case of rejection of application.

Religious Conversion

Before an organisation can receive FCRA registration the government must be satisfied that it has “not indulged in activities aimed at conversion through inducement or force, either directly or indirectly, from one religious faith to another.” The Bill does not define the word “inducement” or “indirectly” leaving it to the interpretation of the authorised official.

Forward Looking Statements

The authorised official is required to be satisfied that the organisation is “not likely to use the foreign contribution for personal gains or divert it for undesirable purpose.” He is also required to determine whether the organisation has “prepared a meaningful project” for the targeted group intended to receive the foreign funds. These forward looking statements are subject to interpretation by the relevant officer.

Administration of Registration

Currently, all applications for FCRA certification have to be submitted to the Ministry of Home Affairs in New Delhi. The absence of regional centres for registration could increase the costs and effort for the applicants.

Organisations of a “Political Nature”

The new Bill prohibits all organisations of a “political nature” from receiving any foreign contribution. The central government has the powers to classify any organisation in this grouping but the Bill does not provide any guidelines of definitions of organisations of a “political nature.” While organisations, upon notification of pending status, have the right to represent themselves to the central government, the Bill does not lay out a process of appeal against such a decision.

Restrictions on Certain Categories

The Bill prohibits journalists, judges, bureaucrats, etc. from accepting foreign contribution. It is unclear whether this would prevent such citizens from accepting foreign awards from a foreign source that is not previously notified by the central government.

Definitions

Foreign Source

The Bill requires all voluntary organizations to register in order to receive foreign contribution from a “foreign source”. The definition of a foreign source includes all companies in which majority shareholding is held by persons who are not Indian citizens. This would include a number of companies such as ICICI Bank Ltd. and Infosys Technologies Ltd.

Foreign Hospitality

The Bill requires members of a Legislature, office-bearers of a political party, judges, government servants or employees of any government-controlled corporation or body to obtain prior approval with the government before accepting any type of foreign hospitality (including staying with foreigners on overseas trips). The definition of “foreign hospitality” exempts “purely casual” offers from such prior permission. The Bill does not define “purely casual.”

Speculative Business

The Bill prohibits persons from using FCRA funds for “speculative business.” The Bill does not define “speculative business.” (Incidentally, the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 lists the investments permissible by a Trust).

Subsidiaries

The Bill defines “subsidiaries” as the meaning assigned in the Companies Act, 1956. That Act defines a company as a subsidiary of another company if the latter controls the composition of the former’s board of directors or holds a majority of its equity share capital. This definition cannot be applied to many entities in the voluntary sector as they may be registered as trusts or associations, and may not have a “board of directors” or any “equity share capital.”

Finance and Administration

Administrative Expenses

The Bill caps use of foreign contribution for administrative expenses at 50 per cent. The central government has the power to determine what will qualify as administrative expenses. This gives discretionary powers to the government authority. It could be argued that the usage of funds should be agreed upon between the donor and the user, as long as it is not detrimental to national interest.

Single Bank Account to Receive FCRA funding

While the Bill allows organisations to utilise foreign contribution through a number of banks, it restricts acceptance of such funds to one registered bank branch. Some donors prefer that their funds are maintained in separate bank accounts. Additionally, such restrictions may pose practical problems for a group with a national presence. There could be a case for permitting multiple accounts and requiring consolidated reporting, as in the case of Income Tax for individuals. In any case, all banks are required to follow the Reserve Bank of India’s Know Your Customer policy to ensure that accounts are being opened by bona fide persons or organisations.

Separate Auditing Requirements

The Bill grants the central government the authority to conduct a separate auditing of accounts of FCRA registered organisations, including power to search and seize suspected accounts. This is a duplication of such powers as the Income Tax Act, 1961 and laws governing companies, trusts, societies etc., cover auditing and reporting issues.

Disposal of Assets

The Bill grants the central government the power to dispose the assets of organisations that are defunct or cease to exist in accordance to the provisions to the law through which the organisation was registered. Should no such law exist, the central government has the authority, through notification, to dispose of all assets created out of foreign contribution. This provision may be problematic in some cases. For example, the change in management of a school may place its building at risk of disposal if it had been originally constructed using foreign funding.

Treatment of Interest

The Bill specifies that interest accrued or income derived from any foreign contribution shall also be considered FCRA funding. This could be an issue for groups which plan to use foreign contribution for the purpose of building a corpus fund. The income generated out of such corpus funds would be considered foreign contribution in perpetuity.

Offences and Penalties

The Bill punishes anyone who accepts or assists any persons, political parties or organisations receiving foreign contribution in contravention of any provision or rule in the Act with imprisonment of up to five years and/or a fine. The Bill does not distinguish between those individuals who do so knowingly and unknowingly.

If articles, securities or currency liable for confiscation are not available to confiscate, the Bill provides for a fine of up to five times the value of currency, etc. seized or Rs 1,000, whichever is more. Thus, authorities may prosecute for an offence of less than Rs 200.





DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.



1Notes

1. This Brief has been developed on the basis of The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Bill, 2006 introduced in Rajya Sabha on December 18, 2006. The Bill has been referred to the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs (Chairperson: Smt. Sushma Swaraj).

2. Ministry of Home Affairs, Annual Report, 2004-05.

3. Gross inflow in 2004-05 was Rs 1,135,250 crore, according to the Balance of Payments statistics released by the Reserve Bank of India.

4. The Receipts Budget 2007-08 (page 45) indicates Rs 5090 crore as revenue foregone on account of Section 80G deductions and Rs 353 crore on account of Section 80GGA. We have assumed that over 90% of the Section 80G donations fall in the 50% deductible bracket.

5. For example, Section 3 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 allows the central government to ban organisations and Section 7 prohibits use of funds, etc.

6. For example, Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 prevents the use of funds generated through criminal activity.

7. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 regulates the cross border flow of funds.


LIIofIndia: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.liiofindia.org/in/other/INPRSLS/2006/17.html