LIIofIndia Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries

Parliamentary Research Service
You are here:  LIIofIndia >> Databases >> Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries >> 2007 >> [2007] INPRSLS 13

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Documents | Noteup | LawCite | Help

The Paramedical and Physiotherapy Central Councils Bill, 2007 - Legislative Brief [2007] INPRSLS 13 (4 December 2007)

Legislative Brief

The Paramedical and Physiotherapy Central Councils Bill, 2007


The Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 4th December, 2007 and was referred to the Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare (Chairperson: Shri Amar Singh).


The Standing Committee is scheduled to submit its report by the first week of the Monsoon Session, 2008.

Highlights of the Bill

Key Issues and Analysis

Recent Briefs:

The Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Bill, 2005 and 2007.

April, 29, 2008


The Constitution (107th Amendment) Bill, 2007 and the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2007.

March 17, 2008


Avinash Celestine

avinash@prsindia.org

June 27, 2008


PRS Legislative ResearchCentre for Policy Research Dharma Marg Chanakyapuri New Delhi – 110021

Tel: (011) 2611 5273-76, Fax: 2687 2746

PART A: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL1

Context

Professionals such as laboratory technicians, or those trained in therapeutic procedures such as physiotherapy or occupational therapy, are unregulated at an all-India level. In contrast, nurses and doctors are regulated by central councils who set minimum educational and ethical standards, register practitioners, and take disciplinary action against those who violate professional norms of conduct. A government notification in 1998 included physiotherapists and occupational therapists under the Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992, though a subsequent notification in 1998 reversed that decision. The Rehabilitation Council of India regulates professionals who work with the disabled.2

As there is no central regulation of these professions, there is a lack of reliable data on the number of practitioners across the country and on the number of educational courses being offered. According to government data, there were 1,740 radio technicians and 12,101 laboratory technicians in rural health care centres across the country as of March 2007.3 According to the Indian Association of Physiotherapists, there are about 25,000 to 30,000 graduates in physiotherapy in India with about 250 colleges offering undergraduate physiotherapy programmes and over 50 colleges offering Masters programmes in physiotherapy.4

Some states such as Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Maharashtra and Himachal Pradesh have passed laws setting up state councils to regulate medical laboratory technicians, physiotherapists or occupational therapists. A Planning Commission Working Group pointed out that there is a lack of uniformity of norms and standards across these states. The report said there was a need to have a central council to ensure uniformity in standards across the country.5

Key Features

Constitution of Central Councils

Setting Educational Standards

Registration and Enforcement of Standards among Practitioners

Directions Issued to the Council by the Central Government

PART B: KEY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

Autonomy of the Councils

T

Clause 3(4)

hirteen of the 25 members of each council are government employees. The other 12 members of the council are also appointed by the government to represent practitioners, teachers and professional associations. There is no provision for the election of any member including the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. In contrast, some councils which regulate other professions include members elected by practitioners (See Table 2).





Table 2: Proportion of Elected Professionals across Regulatory Councils

Name of Council / Regulatory Body

Proportion of elected members* (%)

Paramedical / Physiotherapy Council

0

Pharmacy Council of India

39

Medical Council of India

62

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

80

* Figures show actual composition of existing councils as on date

Sources: The Paramedical and Physiotherapy Central Councils Bill, 2007; www.mciindia.org; www.pci.nic.in; www.icai.org.

T

Clause 39

he central government also has the power to issue directions to the council which the latter is bound to follow. The government has the power to dissolve a council if it feels that the council has persistently failed to carry out such directions.



In comparison, the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 does not bind the Medical Council of India to act on any directions from the government. However the Act does allow for the constitution of a Commission of Enquiry to look into the workings of the council. The MCI is required to adopt any remedies suggested by the Commission, and if it fails to do so, the central government can take steps to ensure that the recommendations of the Commission are carried out. 6

While the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Bill, 2005 empowers the government to give binding directions to the MCI, it can do so only in the ‘public interest’ (the Bill is currently pending in Parliament). In contrast, the Paramedical and Physiotherapy Central Councils Bill does not require the government to issue directions only in the ‘public interest’.

Doctor’s Referral

T

Clauses 2(k), (l) and (o)

he Bill defines occupational therapy and physiotherapy as ‘medically directed’ therapies which imply that patients may not be able to approach professionals in either of these fields without reference from a doctor. Currently, a lack of regulation means that a doctor’s referral is not necessary.7





The need for a doctor’s referral varies across countries. In the UK, it is possible to approach registered physiotherapists or occupational therapists without being referred by a doctor.8 In Canada, physiotherapists are also allowed to act as ‘first contact’ practitioners.9 In the US State of New York, only physiotherapists with three years of practical experience can treat patients without a referral.10 Though California law does not require a referral, physiotherapists can only treat patients who have already been diagnosed – they cannot perform such diagnoses themselves.11

State Acts and the Bill

States such as Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh have laws to regulate the paramedical profession. Maharashtra and Delhi have laws to regulate physiotherapy and occupational therapy.12 According to the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, “legal, medical and other professions” and “education, including technical education, medical education and universities” are covered by the Concurrent List.13

There are differences between the state acts and the central councils Bill. For instance, the state acts typically have just one council to regulate all these professions. The Madhya Pradesh Paramedical Council Act, 2003 and the Himachal Pradesh Paramedical Council Act, 2003 both cover those professionals who practice traditional systems of medicine such as Ayurveda, Unani or Homeopathy. These systems of medicine are regulated by their own, separate councils at the central level.

As both the state law and the central law will be applicable to these professions, practitioners in these states would have to register themselves with both the state and central council.14 There is also the possibility that a practitioner’s name could be removed from the central register for disciplinary reasons, but this does not affect the status of his registration with the state council.

1Notes

. This Brief has been written on the basis of the Paramedical and Physiotherapy Central Councils Bill, 2007, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 4, 2007 and referred to the Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare (Chairperson: Shri Amar Singh). The Standing Committee is scheduled to submit its report by the first week of the Monsoon Session, 2008.

2. The Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992. See http://rehabcouncil.nic.in/council/acts_amend.htm.

3. See Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Rural Health Statistics In India, 2007. http://mohfw.nic.in/NRHM/BULLETIN%20ON.htm. Tables 29 and 31.

4. Indian Association of Physiotherapists, Memorandum Submitted to Honourable Minister for Health, Govt of India, 26/12/2007, Pg. 2.

5. Report of the Working Group on Clinical Establishments, Professional Services Regulation and Accreditation of Health Infrastructure for the 11th Five Year Plan, Planning Commission, http://www.planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp11/wg11_hclinic.pdf.

6. The Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Bill, 2005, seeks to reduce the proportion of elected representatives on the MCI from 69% to 54%. The amendment has not yet been passed by Parliament. See PRS Legislative Research, Legislative Brief on The Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Bill, 2005, http://www.prsindia.org/legis_page.php?bill_id=59.

7. See Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2042, answered on December 7, 2007. Health and Family Welfare Minister, Dr Anbumani Ramadoss said that “Physiotherapists / OT couldn’t be the first contact persons for treatment of patients and it has to be administered under the overall directions of medical professionals.”

8. The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, “Scope of physiotherapy Practice 2008”, London. http://www.csp.org.uk/uploads/documents/PD001%20Scope%20of%20Practice%202008.pdf , pg. 8. For the status of occupational therapy in the UK, see the website of the British Association of Occupational Therapists. http://www.cot.co.uk/public/findinganot/intro.php.

9. For Canada, see the website of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, http://www.physiotherapy.ca/PublicUploads/222419CPA%20Consumer%20Brochure_English_Final.pdf. For the EU, see European Region of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy, European Physiotherapy Benchmark Statement, 2003, http://www.fysiot.ee/dok/01.pdf, Pg. 10.

10. See the website of the New York State Education Department: http://www.op.nysed.gov/ptfaq.htm#direct.

11. See the website of the Physical Therapy Board of California: http://www.ptbc.ca.gov/consumers/consumer_info_faq.shtml#obtain.

12. The relevant state acts are the Himachal Pradesh Paramedical Council Act, 2003; the Maharashtra State Council for Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Act, 2002; and the Madhya Pradesh Paramedical Council Act, 2003.

13. However, “Institutions for scientific or technical education financed by the Government of India, wholly or in part…” and “Co-ordination and determination of standards in institutions for higher education or research and scientific and technical institutions” are part of the Union List.

14. This practice is different from that of doctors whose names are first entered in a state medical register and then aggregated in the Indian medical register maintained by the Medical Council of India. See clauses 21-23, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.

DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.


LIIofIndia: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.liiofindia.org/in/other/INPRSLS/2007/13.html