Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback Maltese Laws

Act No. Vi Of 2010 Entitled The Probation (Amendment) Act (Act No.Vi Of 2010)

ACT No. VI of 2010

AN ACT to amend the Probation Act, Cap. 446.

Short title and commencement.

Cap. 446.

Amendment of article 2 of the principal Act.

BE IT ENACTED by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the House of Representatives, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

1. (1) The short title of this Act is the Probation (Amendment) Act, 2010, and this Act shall be read and construed as one with the Probation Act, hereinafter referred to as "the principal Act".

(2) The provisions of this Act shall come into force on such date as the Minister responsible for justice may, by notice in the Gazette, establish, and different dates may be so established for different provisions and for different purposes of this Act.

2. Article 2 of the principal Act shall be amended as follows: (a) immediately after the definition "community service

order", there shall be inserted the following new definition:
" "competent authority" means the competent authority of Malta established under article 26;";
A 235
(b) immediately after the definition "Director", there shall be inserted the following new definitions:
" "executing State" means the Member State in which the community sanctions are supervised following a decision in accordance with Article 8 of the Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/ JHA of 26 February 2009;
"Framework Decision" means Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26
February 2009 on the application of the principal of mutual
recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions;"; and
(c) immediately after the definition "institution", there shall be inserted the following new definition:
" "issuing State" means the Member State in which the judgment is delivered;".

3. Paragraph (h) of subarticle (2) of article 3 of the principal

Act shall be substituted by the following:
"(h) to assign probation officers to probationers, to supervise provisional orders of supervision and to prepare pre- sentencing reports in accordance with this Act.".

4. Article 7 of the principal Act shall be amended as follows: (a) in subarticle (2) thereof, immediately after the first

proviso there shall be added the following new proviso:
"Provided further that where a probation order which has been made is of a period of less than one year, that order shall be deemed to be of one year.";
(b) in the last proviso of subarticle (2) thereof, immediately after the word "provided" there shall be added the word "further"; and
(c) in subarticle (8) thereof, for the words "The court by which a probation order is made shall forthwith give copies of the order to the probationer, to the Director" there shall be substituted the words "The court by which a probation order is

Amendment of article 3 of the principal Act.

Amendment of article 7 of the principal Act.

A 236

Amendment of article 11 of the principal Act.

made shall order that copies of the order be served forthwith on the probationer and the Director".

5. Article 11 of the principal Act shall be amended as follows:

(a) in subarticle (2) thereof, for the words "or more than two hundred and forty hours" there shall be substituted the words "or more than four hundred and eighty hours"; and
(b) in paragraph (a) of subarticle (3) thereof, for the words "to perform work under such an order;", there shall be substituted the words "to perform work under such an order:"; and immediately thereafter there shall be added the following new proviso:

Amendment of article 14 of the principal Act.

Addition of new article 20A to the principal Act.

"Provided that where the court is so satisfied, it may, after considering the offender’s circumstances, dispense from the need of a written pre-sentencing report and order that a verbal report be submitted, and such verbal report shall be duly recorded in the court’s proceedings.".

6. In subarticle (1) of article 14 of the principal Act, for the words "of not less than three months and not more than one year" there shall be substituted the words "of not less than one month and not more than two years".

7. Immediately after article 20 of the principal Act there shall be added the following new article:

"Community sanction.
20A. A court, on making a community sanction, may subject an offender, in respect of whom the community sanction is in force, to the limitations on leaving Malta as the court may deem fit.".

Amendment of article 21 of the principal Act.

8. Subarticle (1) of article 21 of the principal Act shall be substituted by the following:

"(1) If at any time during the probation period it appears to the Criminal Court that the probationer has failed to comply with any of the requirements of the order, the court may issue a summons requiring the probationer to appear before such court at the place and time specified therein, or may, if the circumstances so require, issue a warrant for the probationer’s arrest:
Provided that except where the alleged failure is brought to the attention of the court by means of an application by the
A 237
probation officer, no such summons or warrant shall be issued by the Criminal Court, or by the Juvenile Court, except on an information in writing and confirmed on oath. In either case the information must be filed within three months of the alleged failure by the probationer:
Provided further that the Court shall appoint for hearing the application within twenty days of the filing of the said application.".

9. Articles 26, 27 and 28 of the principal Act shall be renumbered as articles 35, 36 and 37, respectively.

10. Immediately after article 25 of the principal Act, there shall be inserted the following new articles:

Re-numbering

of articles 26, 27

and 28 of the principal Act.

Addition of new articles 26 to 34 to the principal Act.

"Designation of competent authority in accordance with Framework Decision.

Types of community sanctions.

26. There shall be a competent authority, to be designated by order of the Minister, whose functions shall be the taking of decisions relating to community sanctions, in particular, in case of non-compliance with community sanctions or if the sentenced person commits a new criminal offence, in accordance with article 31(1), where Malta is either the issuing or executing State for the purposes of the mutual recognition of the community sanctions between Member States.
27. (1) In accordance with the Framework Decision, the following community sanctions shall be regulated by the competent authority:
(a) an obligation for the sentenced person to inform a specific authority of any change of residence or working place;
(b) an obligation not to enter certain localities, places or defined areas in the issuing or executing State;
(c) an obligation containing limitations on leaving the territory of the executing State;
A 238
(d) instructions relating to behaviour, residence, education and training, leisure activities, or containing limitations on or modalities of carrying out a professional activity;
(e) an obligation to report at specified times to a specific authority;
(f) an obligation to avoid contact with specific persons;
(g) an obligation to avoid contact with specific objects, which have been used or are likely to be used by the sentenced person with a view to committing a criminal offence;
(h) an obligation to compensate financially for the prejudice caused by the offence and, or an obligation to provide proof of compliance with such an obligation;
(i) an obligation to carry out community service;
(j) an obligation to cooperate with a probation officer, and if necessary with a representative of a social service having responsibilities in respect of sentenced persons; and
(k) an obligation to undergo therapeutic treatment or treatment for addiction.
(2) The competent authority shall notify the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, when implementing the Framework Decision, which community sanctions, apart from those referred to in subarticle (1), it is prepared to supervise. The General Secretariat of the Council shall make the information received available to all Member States and to the Commission.
A 239

Forwarding of community sanctions to competent authorities of member states where Malta is the issuing State.

28. (1) Where Malta is the issuing State, the competent authority shall, on its own initiative, or upon the request of the sentenced person, forward a community sanction to the competent authority of the Member State in which the sentenced person is lawfully and ordinarily residing, in cases where the sentenced person has returned or wants to return to that State:
Provided that the competent authority shall only consent to the forwarding of a community sanction, upon the request of the sentenced person, where the sentenced person has not committed subsequent offences and under such conditions it may deem fit to impose.
(2) When, in applying the provisions of subarticle (1), the competent authority forwards a community sanction to the executing State, it shall ensure that it is accompanied by a certificate, in such form as may be prescribed by the Minister by regulations made under this article.
(3) Once the competent authority of the executing State has recognised the community sanction forwarded to it and has informed the competent authority of such recognition, the competent authority in Malta shall no longer have competence in relation to the supervision of the community sanction imposed, nor to take any subsequent decisions referred to in article 31(1).
(4) The competence referred to in subarticle (3) shall revert to the competent authority:
(a) as soon as the competent authority has notified the competent authority of the executing State about the withdrawal of the certificate referred to in subarticle (2), provided that supervision in the executing State has not yet begun;
A 240
(b) in cases or categories of cases to be specified by the executing State where it may refuse to assume the responsibility of supervision, in particular:

Recognition of community sanctions where Malta is the executing State.

(i) in cases relating to an alternative sanction, where the judgement does not contain a custodial sentence or measure involving the deprivation of liberty to be enforced in case of non-compliance with the obligations or instructions concerned;
(ii) in cases relating to a conditional discharge; and
(iii) in cases where the judgement relates to acts which do not constitute an offence under the law of the executing State, whatever its constituent elements or however it is described;
(c) in cases where the jurisdiction of the executing State has ended in accordance with the provisions of article 32.
29. (1) Where Malta is the executing State, the competent authority shall within sixty days of receipt of the community sanction, recognise the community sanction forwarded, and follow the necessary procedure referred to in article 28(2), and shall without delay take all necessary measures for the supervision of the community sanction, unless it decides to refuse recognition and supervision on the grounds referred to in article 30:
A 241

Grounds for refusing recognition and supervision.

Provided that when, in exceptional circumstances, it is not possible for the competent authority to comply with the time limit provided for in subarticle (1), it shall immediately inform the competent authority of the issuing State by any means, giving the reasons for the delay and indicating the estimated time needed for the final decision to be taken.
(2) Where Malta is the executing State, the competent authority may postpone the decision on recognition of the community sanction in the situation where the certificate referred to in article 28(2) is incomplete or does not correspond to the community sanction, until a reasonable deadline is set for the certificate to be completed or corrected.
30. Where Malta is the executing State, the competent authority may refuse to recognise the community sanctions and assume responsibility for supervising community sanctions on the following grounds, in accordance with Article 11 of the Framework Decision:
(a) the certificate referred to in article 28(2) is incomplete or manifestly does not correspond to the community sanction and has not been completed or corrected within a reasonable period set by the competent authority;
(b) the criteria set out in article
28(1) are not satisfied;
(c) the recognition of the community sanction and assumption of the responsibility for supervising community sanctions would be contrary to the principle of ne bis in idem;
(d) the judgment relates to acts which do not constitute an offence under the laws of Malta;
A 242
(e) the enforcement of the sentence is barred by prescription according to the laws of Malta and falls within its competence according to that law;
(f) there is immunity under the laws of Malta, which makes it impossible to supervise community sanctions;
(g) under the laws of Malta, the sentenced person cannot, owing to his age, be held criminally liable for the offences in respect of which the judgment was issued;
(h) the judgment was rendered

in absentia, unless:

(i) the certificate referred to in article 28(2) states that the person summoned personally or informed through a representative competent according to the laws of Malta of the time and place of the proceedings, or that the person actually received official information of the scheduled time and place of the proceedings and was also informed that a decision may be handed down if he does not appear for the proceedings; or
(ii) the person had given a mandate to a legal counsellor, who was either appointed by the person concerned or by the State, to appear in his stead and that legal counsellor in fact appeared during the proceedings; or
(iii) the person indicated to a competent authority that he does not intend to contest the charges against him; or
A 243

Jurisdiction to take all subsequent decisions and governing law where Malta is the executing State.

(iv) subsequent to the decision, which would have been served upon him, the person concerned, after being informed of his right to appeal or to a retrial, expressly stated that he does not intend to contest the decision or did not contest such decision within the applicable time frame;
(i) the community sanction provides for medical and, or therapeutic treatment which Malta is unable to supervise in view of its legal or healthcare system;
(j) the community sanction is of less than six months’ duration; or
(k) the judgement relates to criminal offences which under the laws of Malta are regarded as having been committed wholly or for a major or essential part within its territory, or in a place equivalent to its territory.
31. (1) Where Malta is the executing State, the competent authority shall have jurisdiction to take all subsequent decisions relating to a community sanction, in particular in case of non-compliance with a community sanction or if the sentenced person commits a new criminal offence. Such subsequent decisions may include:
(a) the modification of obligations or instructions contained in the community sanction or the modification of the duration of the community sanction;
(b) the revocation of the suspension of the execution of the judgement or the revocation of the decision regarding a community sanction; and
(c) the imposition of a custodial sentence or measure involving deprivation of liberty in case of a community sanction.
A 244
(2) If the nature or duration of the relevant community sanction is incompatible with the laws of Malta when Malta is the executing State, the competent authority may adapt them in line with the nature and duration of community sanctions, which apply under the laws of Malta, to equivalent offences. The adapted community sanction or its duration shall correspond as far as possible to that imposed in the issuing State:
Provided that where the community sanction or the duration of the community sanction has been adapted because its duration exceeds the maximum duration provided for under the laws of Malta, where Malta is the executing State, the duration of the adapted community sanction, shall not be below the maximum duration provided for equivalent offences under the laws of Malta:
Provided also that the adapted community sanction shall not be more severe or longer than the community sanction which was originally imposed.
(3) Where Malta is the executing State, the competent authority shall without delay inform the competent authority of the issuing State, by any means which leaves a written record, of all the decisions taken on:
(a) the modification of community sanction;
(b) the revocation of the suspension of the execution of the judgement or revocation of the decision regarding a community sanction;
(c) the enforcement of a custodial sentence or measure involving deprivation of liberty, because of non- compliance with a community sanction;
(d) the lapse of the community sanction.
A 245

End of jurisdiction of the executing State.

Information from the executing State in all cases.

(4) If so requested by the competent authority of the issuing State, the competent authority shall inform it of the maximum duration of deprivation of liberty that is foreseen in the national laws of Malta for the offence which gave rise to the judgment and that could be imposed on the sentenced person in case of breach of the community sanction. This information shall be provided immediately after receipt of the community sanction together with the necessary certificate set out in article 28(2).
32. (1) Where Malta is the executing State, if the sentenced person absconds or no longer has a lawful residence in Malta, the competent authority may transfer the jurisdiction in respect of the supervision of all further decisions relating to the judgement back to the competent authority of the issuing State.
(2) If new criminal proceedings against the person concerned are taking place in the issuing State, the competent authority of the issuing State may request the competent authority to transfer jurisdiction in respect of the supervision of the community sanction and in respect of all further decisions relating to the judgement back to it.
(3) When, in the application of this article, jurisdiction is transferred back to the issuing State, the competent authority of that State shall resume jurisdiction. For the further supervision of the community sanctions, the competent authority of the issuing State shall take account of the duration and degree of compliance with the community sanctions in Malta, as well as of any decisions taken by Malta in accordance with article 31(3).
33. Where Malta is the executing State, the competent authority shall, in accordance with Article 18 of the Framework Decision, without delay inform the competent authority of the issuing State, by any means which leaves a written record, of:
A 246
(a) the transmission of the community sanction together with the certificate referred to in article 28(2) to the competent authority responsible for its recognition and for taking the ensuing measures for the supervision of the community sanction and where it has no competence to recognise it and take the said measures for the supervision, it shall, ex officio, forward it to the competent authority of the issuing State;
(b) the fact that it is in practice impossible to supervise the community sanctions for the reason that, after transmission of the community sanction, together with the certificate referred to in article 28(2), to Malta, the sentenced person cannot be found in the territory of Malta, in which case Malta shall be under no obligation to supervise the community sanction;
(c) the final decision to recognise the community sanction and to assume responsibility for supervising the community sanction;
(d) any decision not to recognise the community sanction and to assume responsibility for supervising the community sanction in accordance with article 31(2), together with the reasons for the decision;
(e) any decision to adapt community sanction in accordance with the provisos to article 31(2), together with the reasons for the decision;
(f) any decision on amnesty or pardon granted by the issuing or executing State which leads to not supervising the community sanction, together, where applicable, with the reasons for the decision.
A 247

Consultations between competent authorities.

34. Where and whenever it is felt appropriate, the competent authority shall consult with the competent authority of another Member State being the issuing State or the executing State as the case may be, with a view to facilitating the smooth and efficient application of the Framework Decision.".
Passed by the House of Representatives at Sitting No. 235 of the
9th June, 2010.
MICHAEL FRENDO

Speaker

PAULINE ABELA

Clerk to the House of Representatives