[Home] [Databases] [Search] [Feedback] [Help] | ||
Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan |
OF SERVICE LAWS
Following
complaints in the media and suggestions forwarded by individuals, the Pakistan
Law Commission decided to undertake the
reformation and modernisation of the laws relating to various civil
services of Pakistan. The services included in the study were Federal Service, Provincial service and services in
the Autonomous Bodies and Corporations. The Commission, therefore, issued an
advertisement in the news media with a
view to solicit public opinion and comments on the issue. The advertisement
reads as follows:
"As desired by its
Chairman, the Pakistan Law Commission is examining all service laws with a view
to bring them in conformity with the teachings of Islam and Pakistan Ideology.
This study will further
help the Government to improve the working and working conditions of all
services as well as to save them from outside influence both political and
otherwise".
In
addition, the Commission wrote letters to the heads of various departments/institutions, asking their views
on the issue and suggestions for improvement. Furthermore, the Commission also
established contact with the relevant organisations/institutions and
interviewed their personnel to seek clarification of written comments they submitted
and to obtain from them additional information relevant to their service.
Besides,
the Commission also organised a Workshop on the subject, wherein experienced
and knowledgeable persons from the
relevant fields, such as judiciary, bureaucracy, academic and legal
profession, were invited to give their views/recommendations for the
improvement of civil service.
The
response from the general public was overwhelming, as a large number of
individuals responded to the Commission's call, giving their views and
suggestions. The departments/organisations/institutions, however, were not all
that enthusiastic in their response, though some of them did submit some very
useful suggestions/recommendations. The information received may be categorised
as follows:
1- Views and comments received from the public, giving their
perception of the services, enumerating complaints against these services,
together with their proposed recommendations for their reformation/improvement.
2- Complaints from the service personnel against the discriminatory
laws and rules in their departments as well as arbitrary decisions of their
superior officers. Some of the personnel also listed suggestions for
reformation and improvement of their organisations.
3- Responses from some service associations, complaining of
discriminatory policies and attitudes affecting their respective
services/cadres; seeking solution of their problems and pleading for uniformity
of laws and rules.
4- Replies from the heads of certain organisations/ institutions,
pinpointing defects/shortcomings in laws/rules concerning their organisations
and suggesting proposals for reformation and improvement.
5- Comments and suggestions obtained from certain experienced
service personnel through interviews.
6- Recommendations from the participants in a Workshop, organised
for the purpose.
The
Commission duly acknowledges the contributions of these individuals, personnel
and associations and appreciate their help and
assistance in the task of restructuring/reforming the service laws. The
views/comments expressed and proposals/recommendations given will go a long way
in helping the Commission to understand the problems, appreciate the issues and
prepare a viable and practicable report
on the subject.
The
Commission, by its reference, is required to examine the following services:
1- Federal Civil Service
2- Provincial Civil Service
3- Service of the Autonomous Bodies
and Corporations
The various
statutes, laws and rules dealing with these services may be enumerated below:
1- The Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1977, as well
as, Provincial Public Service Commission Ordinances, together with rules and
regulations, framed thereunder.
2- The Civil Servants Act, 1973, as well as, Provincial Service
Tribunal Acts, together with rules and regulations, framed thereunder.
3- The (Federal) Service Tribunals Act, 1973, as well as Provincial
Service Tribunal Acts, together with rules and regulations, framed thereunder.
4- Acts/Statutes of the Autonomous Bodies and
Corporations, together with rules and regulations, framed thereunder.
As would
appear from the above-mentioned list of laws, rules and regulations, the
Commission has on its hand a gigantic task of examining and scrutinizing
several statutes, rules and regulations.
However, to save time and be practical in approach, the Commission in
the first phase would confine its report to the examination of federal statutes
only, and recommends to the provinces to follow suit. Even otherwise, the
provinces have in the past usually followed the Federal statutes and rules with very little
changes/modifications. A cursory look at the Provincial statutes clearly brings
out this fact. This is essential as some of the services are common both to the
Federation and Provinces, hence, the need for having similar legislation on the
subject. Such an approach is desirable in view of the prevailing federal system
of government in Pakistan.
So far as
the autonomous institutions and corporations are concerned, such services,
being specialised in nature and character, require separate treatment and
should appropriately be the subject of a separate report.
Accordingly,
the Commission would like to undertake a detailed study of the following
statutes and rules, regulations, made thereunder:
1- The Federal Public Service Commission
Ordinance, 1977.
2- The Civil Servants Act, 1973.
3- The Service Tribunals Act, 1973.
The Commission in its meeting held on 26 - 31
December, 1992 approved the part of Report dealing with the Federal Public
Service Commission. The remaining portion is awaiting consideration by the
Commission.
Federal Public Service
Commission
In
democratic societies, recruitment to civil service as well as the terms and
conditions of service of the civil servants are regulated through a free,
impartial and independent institution. Such institution is generally referred
to as Civil Service Commission. The institution of Civil Service Commission is
designed to serve mainly two purposes:
(i) to induct merit, calibre and efficiency into the service; and
(ii) to help the civil service free of political influence and maintain
it as an independent and impartial institution, geared to executing the laws and
implementing the policy objectives of the government.
It is
commonly acknowledged that an efficient and impartial civil service, based on
merit, is a sine qua non for the success of democratic system. It is the civil
service which gives stability and continuity to the democratic system. In England the recruitment of
civil servants and their placement in various departments is made by the Civil
Service Commission. The British Civil Service Commission is an independent
institution whose members are appointed by the Crown. In the United States, prior to 1883, the civil
servants were appointed on the discretion of government in power. This system
called, the "Spoils System" was based on the principle of political
patronage. However, this system led to several abuses and was ultimately
scrapped. Instead the Civil Service
Commission was established in 1883. This Commission is responsible for recruitment to civil
services. Similarly, in Canada,
Australia and India, appointment to the civil service and laws and rules
concerning the terms and conditions of civil servants are regulated through
their respective Civil Service Commissions.
After
independence, Pakistan adopted the 'Government of India Act, 1935' as an
interim Constitution. This Constitution had provisions for Public Service
Commission. Such Commissions were established both at the federal and
provincial levels. The composition, role and functions of the Commission were
also laid down in the Constitution [1].
The same provisions were retained, mutatis mutandis, in the subsequent
(1956, 1962 and 1972 (Interim)) Constitutions. The Constitution of 1973, however, departed from this
practice and authorised the Parliament and Provincial Legislatures to provide a
Public Service Commission in their respective jurisdictions [2]. Thus, both the Federal and Provincial
Governments made statutes for the establishment of Public Service Commissions
[3]. Since their establishment the
Public Service Commission maintained a fairly good reputation and kept reasonably
high profile and image in the public. Its members were generally known for
their integrity, impartiality and objectivity. The selection procedure for the
appointment of civil servants had generally been fair. There were hardly any
complaints of the Commission members resorting to nepotism or favouritism or
accommodating any outside influence or pressure. The result was that the
members of the civil service, being selected on merit, were generally speaking,
competent and efficient. However, of late, the situation has changed. There are
complaints of the Commission members, being appointed through political
influence. It is alleged that such
members lack calibre, integrity, and are vulnerable to influence/pressure from
outside. There are also complaints of the Commission staff being inefficient,
because of which delays occur in finalising
the selection procedure. Furthermore, there are reports of leakage of
examination papers and involvement of the Commission staff in the scandals of
selling the question papers.
The
successive governments, both central and provincial, through a variety of
techniques, ventured to ignore as well as by-pass the Commission and make
direct appointments, sometimes in relaxation and other times violation of
rules. One favourite technique adopted by the successive governments, has been
to appoint persons on ad-hoc or temporary basis and subsequently regularise
their services through an Act or Ordinance. As a result, thousands of people,
with low calibre and inferior qualifications have been inducted into the civil
service.
The
recruitment was largely on the basis of nepotism or political patronage.
Similarly, favouritism and patronage, rather than merit and efficiency, were
the determining criteria for promotion and placement in civil service.
Tragically, some of the appointees were such, that having failed to qualify the
Commission's test, their candidatures were rejected by the Commission, however,
such rejected candidates entered into the civil service through back door. Since
bulk of appointments are made by the Ministers and the criterion of selection
is anything but merit, most of the appointees are incapable, incompetent and
inefficient.
The end
result has been the lowering of standards in the civil service, giving rise to
inefficiency, incompetency and even corruption. The service has been
politicised. Political links and connections play a major role in the
appointment, promotion and placement of civil servants. Consequently, there is
a lot of heart-burning and grumbling going on among the civil servants. Honest,
efficient, dedicated and hard working employees find it difficult to get a free
and impartial environment so very essential for their functions. There is a
deep sense of insecurity among the civil servants. There is a widespread
feeling of frustration among them. This state of affairs has adversely affected
their performance and consequently, there are widespread complaints of
inefficiency, incompetency and
corruption among the civil bureaucracy.
This downward
slide which is gaining momentum each passing day needs to be checked. The
government cannot afford to let its executive branch cripple and crumble. The
people would not want the administrative set up to come to a complete halt,
thereby increasing their problems and add to their miseries. The nation would expect of its
representatives, to repair the damage and improve the administration. Apart
from other measures, one important factor which can help in improving the
administrative machinery is to restore the image and status of the Public
Service Commission and improve its functions so that this institution is
enabled to play its role more effectively, and give a better civil service and
quality administration to the nation.
Accordingly,
we will suggest certain changes to the structure and functions of the Public
Service Commission.
Public Service Commission
Pakistan
inherited the 'Government of India Act, 1935' as its first (interim)
Constitution. This Act contained detailed and elaborate provisions regarding the composition, role
and functions of the Public Service Commission. Subsequent (1956, 1962 and 1972
(Interim)) Constitutions followed broadly this pattern and provided for the
Public Service Commission However, the 1973 Constitution departed from this
pattern and did not incorporate comprehensive and detailed provisions relating
to the Commission. This was done as
part of a reform package introduced by the Government to restructure the civil
service. Consequently, detailed provisions regarding the composition and
functions of the Commission and safeguards as to terms and conditions of
service of the civil servants were not given in the Constitution. Instead the
appropriate Legislature was authorised to deal with the matter. The Constitution
provided:
Article 242. Public
Service Commission.-- (1) (Majlis-e-Shoora(Parliament)) in relation to the
affairs of the Federation and the Provincial Assembly of a Province in relation
to the affairs of a Province, may, by law, provide for the establishment and
constitution of a Public Service Commission.
(1A) The Chairman of
the Public Service Commission constituted in relation to the affairs of the
Federation shall be appointed by the President in his discretion [4].
(2) A Public Service
Commission shall perform such functions as may be prescribed by law.
Accordingly,
both the Parliament and Provincial legislatures passed statutes, establishing
Public Service Commissions. The Federal Public Service Commission was
established under the 'Federal Public Service Commission Act, 1973.' This Act was, however, repealed in 1977 and
substituted by the 'FPSC Ordinance, 1977.' The Commission currently functions
under this statute.
Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance,
1977
1. Terms
and Conditions of Service.-- Section 4 of the Ordinance provides for the
terms and conditions of service of the Commission members. This section reads:
"4. Terms of
office of members, etc.: (1) The President may determine the terms of office of
the Chairman and other members which shall not exceed five years:
Provided that the President may extend the terms of office of
the Chairman or any other member for such period, not exceeding period of three
years, as may deem fit:
Provided further that a person holding office as Chairman or
member immediately before the commencement of this Ordinance shall cease to
hold office on such date as the President may direct.
(2) A member may resign his office by writing under his hand
addressed to the President."
This section
is couched in language to avoid the certainty of tenure of members, so very
essential for the independent and impartial functions of the commission. This
section provides neither fixed service tenure nor fixed period of extension in
such tenure. It gives wide discretion
to the appointing authority to appoint a member for a short period and then
keep on extending his tenure. Such an appointment seems identical to an ad-hoc
appointment, which the appointing authority may keep on extending, keeping in view
the performance of such member. The
provision is open to wider abuse and affects the freedom and independence of
the members. Owing to the uncertainty of tenure, such member may not perform
his duties in a free, fair and impartial manner. It is, therefore, suggested
that the term of office of members
should be fixed as 3 years with no provision for extension. Thus section 4
should be amended as follows:
Section 4.
Terms of office of members, etc. (1).--
The Chairman and members of the Commission shall be appointed for a term
of 3 years by the president.
Proviso (1) be deleted.
Proviso (2) be deleted as it has now become
redundant.
2. Functions.-- Section 7 states the functions of the
Commission.
7. Functions of the
Commission: The functions of the Commission shall be:
(a) to conduct test
and examinations for recruitment [5] (of persons other than officers of the
Armed Forces of Pakistan)[6] (who are appointed to such services or posts on
the recommendation of the High Powered Selection Board constituted by the
President for the purpose) to all Pakistan services, the civil services of the
Federation and such posts in connection with the affairs of the federation as
may be prescribed by rules made under section 10, and
(b) to advise the President
on matters relating to qualifications for, and method of recruitment, to the
services and posts referred to in clause (a), and any other matter which the
President may refer to Commission.
Explanation: In this
section, "recruitment" means initial appointment otherwise than by
promotion or transfer.
As is clear, the Ordinance assigns only 3 functions to
the Commission. These functions are:
(1) conducting test and interviews for recruitment to civil service and other
services specified in the Rules framed under section 10;
(2) advising President on matters relating to qualifications
for, and methods of recruitment to the services and posts referred to
above; and
(3) advising the President on any other matter which the
President may refer to the Commission.
Prior to
the 1973 Constitution, the powers and functions of the Commission were fairly
extensive and also covered the areas of promotion and transfer of civil
servants. Besides, the Commission was also consulted in disciplinary matters.
These functions have now been withdrawn from the Commission, as an independent
body, free from government influence, was an important safeguard for the
protection of rights and interests of the civil servants. In promotion and
disciplinary matters, the civil servants could count on the judgment of the Commission, as a counter
balance to any fear of injustice or victimization from his superior. This
safeguard, having been withdrawn, the civil servant has become insecure and
vulnerable to pressure. This state of affairs is not conducive to the effective
functioning of the civil service. We, therefore, suggest the restoration of
erstwhile role and functions of the Commission. Section 7 may, therefore, be
amended as follows:
Section
7(b) be substituted as follows:
Section
7(b): To advise the President on the matters:
(1) relating to
qualifications for, and methods of recruitment to the services and posts referred to in Clause (a);
(2) relating to principles on which appointment, promotion
and transfer to another service or
cadre except to the extent that the President may by rules, specify the matters
in which either generally or in any particular class of cases or circumstances
it shall not be necessary to consult the Commission; and
(3) which the President may refer to the Commission.
As
mentioned earlier, prior to 1973, the composition of the Commission, as well as
its functions and responsibilities were laid down in the Constitution. However,
the 1973 Constitution brought a fundamental change to this arrangement. The
Constitution provided that the federal and provincial legislatures may
establish Public Service Commissions. This change had the effect of diminishing
the status of Commission and reducing its powers and functions. Two major
changes were introduced:
(1) The composition
and functions of the Commission were not given in the Constitution. Instead the
federal and provincial legislatures were empowered to frame statutes for this
purpose; and
(2) A number of
functions, such as, the principles of promotions and transfers as well as terms
and conditions of service of the civil service were taken out of the purview of
the Commission.
The results
of this change have been extremely distressing and disappointing. The
successive governments have sought to by-pass the Commission and make appointments in violation of rules
and laws. Consequently, inept, inefficient and undeserving persons have been
inducted into the civil service. There have come to light cases when candidates
having failed the Commission's test, were appointed through back door, in some
cases even to higher posts. The role of the legislatures have been extremely
unhelpful. The politicians, lacking courage and foresight, relented under pressure
and recommended appointments and promotions of inept, inefficient and incapable
persons. The situation is fast deteriorating. All efforts to stop this practice
have ended in fiasco. Even legal safeguards have proved ineffective. It
is,therefore, recommended that through an amendment in the Constitution the
erstwhile character of the Public Service Commission be restored.
In line
with the previous practice, the members of the Commission should be given an
oath by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of Pakistan in the following form:
I, ..................................... do solemnly swear
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to Pakistan: That, as a member or Chairman of the
................ Public Service Commission, I will discharge my duties and perform
my functions, honestly, to the best of my ability, faithfully in accordance
with the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the law, and
always in the interest of the solidarity, integrity, well-being and prosperity of Pakistan. That I will not
allow my personal interest to influence my official conduct or my official
decisions and that in the performance of my functions I will act without fear
or favour, affection or ill-will.
References:-
1. Article 264
to 268 of the Government of India Act, 1935
2. Article 242
of the Constitution
3. The FPSC
currently functions under the FPSC Ordinance, 1977.
Similarly statutes exist for Provincial Public Service Commissions.
4. Inserted by
P.O.No. 14 of 1985
5. Inserted by
the FPSC (Amendment) Ordinance, 1980
6. Inserted by
the FPSC (Amendment) Ordinance, 1981
FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
(AMENDMENT)
ACT, 1993
An Act further to amend Federal Public
Service Commission Ordinance, 1977.
Whereas it is expedient further to amend the Federal
Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1977 (XLV of 1977), for the purpose
hereinafter appearing;
It is hereby enacted as follows:
1. Short
title and commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the Federal Public Service
Commission (Amendment) Act, 1993.
(2) It shall come into force at once.
2. Amendment
of Section 4, Ordinance XLV of 1977.- In the Federal Public Service Commission
Ordinance, 1977 (XLV of 1977), hereinafter called the said Ordinance, in
Section 4, for sub-section (1) the following shall be substituted, namely,
"4(1) The Chairman and
Members shall be appointed for a term of three years by the President".
3. Amendment
of Section 7, Ordinance XLV of 1977.- In the said Ordinance, in Section 7, for
clause (b) the following shall be substituted, namely,
"(b) to advise the
President on the matters-
(i) relating to qualifications for, and method of recruitment to the
services and posts referred to in clause (a);
(ii) relating to principles on which appointment, promotion, and
transfer to another service or cadre except to the extent that the President
may by rules, specify the matters in which either generally or in any
particular class of cases or circumstances it shall not be necessary to consult
the Commission; and
(iii) which the President may refer to the Commission".
Statement of Objects and
Reasons
These
recommendations of the Pakistan Law Commission seek to amend
the Federal
Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1977 to fix the term of the
Chairman
and Members of the Federal Public Service Commission and enlarge
the scope of its functions.
CommonLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.commonlii.org/pk/other/PKLJC/reports/13.html